window stacking meta-model
Window Stacking Meta-Models for Clinical EEG Classification
Zhu, Yixuan, Kandasamy, Rohan, Canham, Luke J. W., Western, David
Windowing is a common technique in EEG machine learning classification and other time series tasks. However, a challenge arises when employing this technique: computational expense inhibits learning global relationships across an entire recording or set of recordings. Furthermore, the labels inherited by windows from their parent recordings may not accurately reflect the content of that window in isolation. To resolve these issues, we introduce a multi-stage model architecture, incorporating meta-learning principles tailored to time-windowed data aggregation. We further tested two distinct strategies to alleviate these issues: lengthening the window and utilizing overlapping to augment data. Our methods, when tested on the Temple University Hospital Abnormal EEG Corpus (TUAB), dramatically boosted the benchmark accuracy from 89.8 percent to 99.0 percent. This breakthrough performance surpasses prior performance projections for this dataset and paves the way for clinical applications of machine learning solutions to EEG interpretation challenges. On a broader and more varied dataset from the Temple University Hospital EEG Corpus (TUEG), we attained an accuracy of 86.7%, nearing the assumed performance ceiling set by variable inter-rater agreement on such datasets.
- Europe > United Kingdom > England (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.04)
- Europe > Poland > Greater Poland Province > Poznań (0.04)
- Asia > Singapore (0.04)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area > Neurology (0.93)
- Health & Medicine > Health Care Providers & Services (0.69)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.96)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.47)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Performance Analysis > Accuracy (0.46)